An accident of birth

Last week the Townsville Bulletin published a letter from Michael Raper, Acting CEO of Australian Red Cross. In the letter, which appeared under the banner, “ A cry for humanity”, Michael Raper shared his distress at the current treatment of asylum seekers and refugees.

The final paragraph of his letter reads “As a society we should be supporting further improvements to community care for asylum seekers, and continually to move away from harsh and inhumane alternatives. It is time to put the vulnerability of asylum seekers back into the debate and to focus on the humanity that unites us all.”

This sentiment was strongly reinforced in the film “Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea” that was recently launched at the Courthouse Theatre in Townsville as part of a National Tour. The film recounts the experiences of Melbourne lawyer Jessie Taylor who, together with an interpreter and the film’s director, went to Indonesia to meet the people who were contemplating the hazardous boat journey from Indonesia to Australia.

Jesse and her crew travelled across Indonesia and met with 250 asylum seekers in jails, detention centres and hostels. Through candid interviews, hidden camera footage and in the words of asylum seekers themselves, the story of the ‘refugee’ is told. Through watching this film we understand what pushes people to leave home, hear about the things they leave behind, and we also can understand the uncertainty of their predicament in Indonesia and what it takes to turn someone into a ‘boat person’?

The film ends on a poignant note. Many of the interviews in the film were made two years ago. The final images of the film tell us what has happened in the intervening time to the people who we have come to know through the film. Some have settled in Australia, some are in detention centres in Australia, but the majority have either been  “lost at sea” or are shown as “whereabouts unknown”.

On the way to the theatre I had been listening to the song “Accident of birth” by Australian songwriter Bruce Watson. Part of the first verse goes

“I could have been a young man on the ocean
Seeking safety far from home
Running from a land that’s sad and broken
Wondering where compassion’s gone.”

Then the chorus
“It’s just an accident, just an accident
Just an accident of birth”.

Watching the film I could not help but think one of the refugees being interviewed could have been me, that woman could have been my wife, the young girl my daughter.

Later in the song Bruce sings
“I happen to be born in a land of plenty
I happen to be male and I happen to be white
It happens that my bowl has never been empty
It happens that I have never been forced to fight…”

Why do we as a nation find it so hard to share – why do we demonise those who flee from persecution and seek refuge in our country where we have so much?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

I am because we are

Last week I read a paper by Clive Hamilton, Professor of Public Ethics at the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, a joint centre of Charles Sturt University and the University of Melbourne. The paper was from a presentation Prof Hamilton gave last August at the American Sociological Association in Denver USA.

In his presentation Prof Hamilton summarised the latest research into global warming and came up with the conclusion that the best we can hope for is to limit temperature increase this century to 4C.  In the words of Adelaide scientist  Corey Bradshaw this will mean “our entire society, biodiversity and life as we know it will be severely diminished.

Prof Hamilton’s central message was that we have to take this as given – and “we must find ways to navigate it, to accommodate whatever it throws at us, to work out how to live on a planet less liveable.”

How we might ask? Last week I was sent this apocryphal story from Africa that gives me some hope.

An anthropologist invited some children to play a game. He put a basket full of fruit under a tree and told the children that the first one to reach the fruit was the winner and could have all the fruit. When he told them to run, they all joined hands and ran together, then all sat down to share the fruit. When he asked them why they ran like that, when one of them could have had all the fruit to herself, they replied “Ubuntu!”. In Hausa Ubuntu means “I am because we are”.

Western individualist culture has got the world into the mess we now find ourselves with global warming, widening disparities between rich and poor etc.

Some have dubbed this century as the Chinese century which suggests that as the aspirations of the Chinese people to consume like us are met, China will become the economic powerhouse of the world.

And meanwhile global temperatures will soar even higher – with increases as high as 12 or 16C.

If we are to have a future then maybe it needs to be the African century. And like those children we can learn to say “I am because we are” and really believe it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Try holding your breath while you count your money

Last week I was sent the poster with the quote that says it all -

Try holding your breath

I wanted to read more about Guy McPherson, the author of the quote, and last Sunday came across his blog “Nature bats last”. I watched the you-tube of a lecture that Guy gave recently at the University of Massachusetts in which he cites some studies that suggest temperatures could increase by as much as 16 C by 2100. That definitely would mean goodbye to the world we know.

Even if earth temperatures rise by only 2C by the end of this century, this will set in chain feedback loops that will make climate disaster inevitable.

What do we say – what do we do in the face of evidence like this? My daughter is 33 and I have to ask myself if I should I encourage her or any other young person to have children.

Doing nothing is not an option. I decided that I should start talking about this to my friends and colleagues to see what their thoughts and responses were. I was encouraged the next day when South Australian scientist Corey Bradshaw posted the entry “Scaring our children with the future” on his ConservationBytes blog site.

It was heartening to read someone else grappling with the same issues as I was. At the beginning of his entry Corey summarises his position “…I tend to be more of a pragmatic pessimist when it comes to the future …if I can’t reduce the rate of destruction and give my family a slightly better future in spite of this reality, at least I will damn well die trying.’

Corey then describes his discomfort when challenged by his 5 year old daughter about global warming.

“Why is this happening? Why are people not doing anything about it? Why are there so many stupid people in the world continuing to emit greenhouse gases without considering my future (again highly paraphrased from 5-year old syntax)?” she asked.

When Corey was unable to provide the answers she needed, she cried. And she has nightmares.

Some friends questioned Corey’s openness and suggested he wait until she was older before discussing this topic. Cory rejects this option. “This is bloody scary stuff and if the youngest generation doesn’t understand this, then we have no hope at all. We need to inundate schools – from primary to university – with the mind-blowing reality of what we’re doing to our only home.”

I am with Corey – let’s talk about it. Let’s get it out there.

It was tragic that an Australian Prime Minister should identify action on global warming as the most important moral issue of our time and then put it aside because it looked too hard.

It is absolutely terrifying that the leader of the Federal Opposition and presumably most of his party don’t even believe that climate change is happening.

If we are not able to bring about courageous government and community action on climate change, to borrow Corey’s words again, let’s “damn well die trying”.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Understanding the GFC – how governments came to be held hostage by the big banks that caused the mess in the first place

“The unfairness of the global financial crisis has been hard to miss. Greek pensioners impoverished, American home owners bankrupted, unemployment throughout the developed world soaring. And the worst that seems to happen to bankers and financiers is a loss of their oversized bonuses, and even that has not happened often.”

These are the opening words of a recent post on Eureka Street by business journalist David James. In straightforward terms David James explains the causes of the economic mess the world finds itself in today.

Here are the next few paragraphs from his article:
“Imagine the global financial markets as a block of flats. On the first floor is the ‘real’ economy, the commercial exchange of goods and services. This equals about $50 trillion, with growth increasingly coming from developing economies because Europe, the US and Japan are experiencing declining growth rates.

The second floor is the conventional world of money: bank lending, shares, land, bonds. It is about $350 trillion, according to the McKinsey Global Institute.

The third floor is derivatives. These are complex financial instruments ‘derived’ from more conventional forms of money (that is, it sits on the second floor). It is possible, for instance, to take out a derivative, such as a futures contract, to bet on the direction of a company’s shares on the stock exchange. This ‘derived’ trade can create much larger profits or losses than would be possible with the actual shares and may not even require buying or selling the actual shares.”

David James goes on to explain the absurdity of the situation we find ourselves in because we live in a badly engineered block of flats.

The problem David James says is that money is seen to be the centre of this topsy turvey system and not people.

“Instead of money being used in the service of people, people are increasingly serving the interests of money and its high priests.”

Read Davis James’ full article at http://www.eurekastreet.com.au/article.aspx?aeid=34683

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Olly the activist dog gets it – why can’t George?

Image

By one of those strange quirks of electorate boundaries, our local representative in Federal Parliament is George Christensen who resides in the city of Mackay, some 380km to the South. Every month or so George has a letter featured in the Townsville Bulletin criticising the Government’s policy on refugees.

George’s letter earlier this week accuses the Labor Government of being “desperate and clueless” and presents the Coalition’s simple solutions for dealing with asylum seeker arrivals – turn the boats back and re-introduce Temporary Protection Visas.

In each of his letters George repeats the Coalition mantra that asylum seekers are either queue jumpers or economic migrants seeking a better life in Australia.

I have requested a meeting with George the next time he visits the Northern end of his electorate. I would like to point out to him that things are not always that simple in our world today.

I intend to introduce George to the web site of the Refugee Council of Australia which has a section devoted to “Myths about refugees and asylum seekers”.

http://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/f/myth-long.php

George would discover that rather than being queue jumpers or economic migrants, the vast majority of people arriving by boat (between 70 and 90 per cent) are later determined to be “genuine refugees” – i.e. people who would be at risk of persecution or worse if they had remained in their country of origin.

Hopefully George would also stop referring to these people as illegal arrivals. He would be reminded by the web site that the UN Refugee Convention recognises that refugees have a right to enter a country for the purposes of seeking asylum, regardless of how they arrive or whether they hold valid travel or identity documents.

If George could find the time to read this web site, he would see that his regular letters to the Bulletin on this issue perpetuate these myths.

I would like to think George as my elected representative, sees his role as helping people get a better understanding of the issues surrounding refugees and asylum seekers, rather than contributing to the misinformation that abounds.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

The saddest story of the whole movement

With all the excitement around the recent re-election of Barack Obama I have been reading some accounts of the US civil rights movement. I came across the story of Clyde Kennard which according to John Dittmer, a notable historian of Mississippi’s civil rights movement, is “the saddest story of the whole movement”.

A full account of this story by Prof Timothy J Minchin and Emeritus Prof John A Salmond of Latrobe University was recently published as “The saddest story of the whole movement: The Clyde Kennard case and the Search for Racial Reconciliation in Mississippi 1955-2007″. http://mdah.state.ms.us/pubs/kennard.pdf

There is no denying this is a very sad story but it also highlights the amazing transformation in race relations in the US in the past 50 years. Below is a summary of Minchin and Salmond’s article.

Clyde Kennard was born into a farming family in Hattiesburg in the southern US state of Mississippi on June 12 1927. Growing up he was quiet and studious and he moved to Chicago when he was 12 to attend school there. He joined the US Army when he was 18 and served for 7 years which included active service in Korea and a term in Germany.

In 1952 he left the Army with an honourable discharge. He used some of his savings to purchase a 20 acre farm for his mother and step father in Hattiesburg and Clyde began studies at the University of Chicago. In 1955 his stepfather died so Clyde left Chicago to return to Hattiesburg to help his mother run the family farm.

He had completed three years of a Political Science major and understandably wished to continue his studies at Mississippi Southern College which was 15 minutes down the road from his home.

There was only one problem – no African American student had ever been admitted to Mississippi Southern – or to any other university in that State. Mississippi had done more than any other US state to ensure that education remain segregated, and the Mississippi State legislature had set up a specially constituted Sovereignty Commission with the sole mission of resisting outside efforts to impose integration on the State’s education system.

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored Peoples (NAACP) declared in 1960 that “any negro who applies to a ‘white’ school in Mississippi is a marked man”. In 1958 when Clennon King, a black minister of religion, attempted to enrol in the University of Mississippi he was taken to the state mental hospital and held there for two weeks “under observation”. Two weeks later he was pronounced sane and did not try to re-enrol again. Soon after this he left the State.

Clyde Kennard knew all this but believed that his cause was a just one and that he would be able to win the administration of Mississippi Southern College over to his cause. He first applied in 1955 and this application was rejected because he could not provide character references from five alumni who lived in the same county. Of course all the alumni were white and in the heavily segregated community Clyde had no opportunity to even know who the alumni were. When he asked the college administration for a list of the alumni he was told that no list was available.

In 1958 Clyde announced in a letter to the local newspaper that he intended to enrol for the term that commenced the following January. The Sovereignty Commission by this stage were quite alarmed at his persistence. They discussed a number of schemes to prevent him from enrolling. Dudley Connor, who was on the Commission and lead the White Citizens’ Committee in Hattiesburg, told the Commission that he could easily arrange the young man’s killing promising that “Kennard’s car could be hit by a train or he could have some accident on the highway and nobody would ever know the difference”. Others on the Commission rejected this option because they feared it would be counter-productive and turn Clyde Kennard into a martyr.

In early January 1959 Clyde met with the Governor of Mississippi James P Coleman and the President of Mississippi Southern College William McCain in the Governor’s office. He was persuaded by them that it “perhaps… would not be in the best interest of the general community” for him to attend Mississippi Southern. There is some conjecture about what caused Clyde to change his mind – some believe he was promised a place at the College if he delayed his application until after the upcoming elections for Governor.

On September 1959 Clyde informed President McCain that he intended enrolling for the September semester. The Sovereignty Commission tried a number of strategies to dissuade Clyde including foreclosing on his poultry farm and confiscating his stock, and pressuring conservative African American leaders in the State to meet with Clyde to get him to change his mind.

When it became apparent that Clyde was not going to change his mind the authorities went for the jugular. The Poultry cooperative that had foreclosed on the Kennard farm was burgled in September 1960 and five bags of chicken feed worth $25 were stolen. A young black employee Johnny Lee Roberts admitted taking the feed but claimed that Clyde Kennard had planned the break-in.

Clyde was arrested and charged with accessory to burglary and in November an all-white jury took only ten minutes to convict him and he was sentenced to seven years gaol – the maximum term available.

He was sent to the high security Parchman Penitentiary where he had to work long hard days on the prison’s cotton plantation. The purpose of this plantation was to break the spirit of any African Americans who had the temerity to challenge the segregation laws. After a year working in the fields Clyde began complaining of severe abdominal pains.

The pains intensified and he was sent to the University of Mississippi Hospital in Jackson where a large lesion was discovered in his left colon. In June 1962 the hospital librarian reported that doctors had given Kennard only a 20% chance of living five years and she recommended that Clyde be given a parole on medical grounds. This recommendation was ignored and he was sent back to the prison plantation to struggle on. He soon lost 40 pounds in weight and other prisoners were forced to carry him into the fields and return him to his cell when he collapsed.

After his situation was brought to national attention by the NAACP, Clyde was released from prison in early 1963 and died on 4 July that year. Author John Howard Griffin visited Clyde Kennard shortly before his death and reported that Clyde “lay with a sheet pulled up over his face so no one could see the grimace of pain”.

Clyde told Griffin that it would all be worthwhile “if it would only show this country where racism finally leads”.

4 July 1963 may have been the end of Clyde’s life but he left a legacy. In 1965 two women Raylawni Branch and Elaine Armstrong became the first African Americans to attend what had now become the University of Southern Mississippi. By 1993, three decades after Clyde’s death, 1702 African Americans were attending the University and this represented 14% of total enrolment. In the town of Hattiesburg schools were integrated, job opportunities had improved and African Americans had won a wide range of elected offices.

And 45 years later in 2008, Barack Obama was elected the 43rd President of the United States.

Footnote: In December 2005 reporter Jerry Mitchell tracked down witness Johnny Lee Roberts who told him that Clyde Kennard had “nothing to do with stealing the chicken feed” and that he had been arrested “not because of the feed but because he was trying to go to Southern”. 45 years later Roberts wanted to come clean because he had “always felt bad about what had happened to Clyde”.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Excise Parliament House … now you’re talking

Last Tuesday the government announced that mainland Australia will be excised from Australia’s migration zone to deter asylum seekers http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2012/s3622281.htm

Some of the people who will be responsible for bringing in this new legislation such as Minister Bowen and Anthony Albanese are the ones who spoke out most strongly against the Howard government’s plan to do the same thing back in 2006.

Just as with re-opening detention centres on Manus and Nauru, their justification is that they are following the expert panel’s recommendations.

They look seriously at the camera and say “The expert panel made me do it…”

Of some comfort to those of us who live in Townsville is that we have been re-united with Magnetic Island which was excised from the migration zone in 2006. Excision of off-shore islands back then seemed silly enough – now we have excised mainland Australia and so we are in “No-man’s land” together.

Last Thursday Townsville had a visit from the Refugee Council of Australia (RCA). The RCA is the peak advocacy body for refugees and asylum seekers and they are currently conducting consultations in preparation for their annual submission to government.

The consultation, conducted by Louise Olloff RCA’s settlement officer, included a presentation on the current world refugee situation and the implications of the recommendations of the expert panel.

The presentation can be downloaded from the RCA’s website

http://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/r/isub/2013-14-IntakeSub-paper.pdf

The RCA paper cites the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) who estimates that there are 859,000 asylum seekers and refugees who will need resettlement in the next few years. Of these 180,000 will need to be resettled in 2013 and currently there are only 81,000 available places.

The number sounds high until we remember that Australia’s official immigration target for 2013 is 180,000 of whom only 20,000 will be refugees and asylum seekers.

Surely with some creative education and training programs we could take more than 20,000 from among those in desperate need of resettlement.

Maybe this is what our politicians could be exercising their minds about rather than hair-brain schemes of excision.

Now I could get excited about excising Canberra from the rest of Australia but that would be unfair to the people of Canberra.

How about Parliament House during a joint sitting?

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment